High Court Of Madras - Writ Appeal - ஊக்க ஊதிய மேல்முறையீட்டு வழக்கு - தீர்ப்பு நகல்

High Court Of Madras - Writ Appeal - ஊக்க ஊதிய மேல்முறையீட்டு வழக்கு - தீர்ப்பு நகல் 👇👇👇

JUDGEMENT COPY: A.SUNDARI - WA/3491/2024 & L.SRIPRIYA 3496/2024 (Honourable Mr Justice R. SURESH KUMAR,Honourable Mr Justice C. SARAVANAN ) dated 03-12-2024

கீழ்காணும் 2 தீர்ப்புகளை (Hc of madras & Madurai bench) சுட்டிக்காட்டி - மேற்கண்ட தீர்ப்பை - சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற இரு நபர் அமர்வு Division bench (Justice R.Sureshkumar & G.ArulMurugan) - ஊக்க ஊதியம் வழங்குவதை மீண்டும் - உறுதி செய்திருந்தது... அதன் தீர்ப்பு நகல்... COMMON PRAYER : Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order in W.P.Nos.6252 and 6253 of 2024 dated 11.03.2024 and allow the above writ appeals.

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) These intra Court appeals have been directed against the order passed by the writ Court dated 11.03.2024 in W.P.Nos.6252 and 6253 of 2024.

2. The question that was posed before the learned Judge is as to whether the writ petitioners since have acquired additional qualification, would be entitled to get the additional incentive increment or not in view of G.O.(Ms)No.37, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (FR-VI) Department dated 10.03.2020.

3. The issue of fixing a cut-off date under the Government Order making them dis-entitled to get the advance incentive increment for those who acquired the additional qualification had engaged the Division Bench of this Court at Madurai Bench in W.A.(MD)No.975 of 2024, where a judgment has been passed by the Division Bench of this Court at Madurai Bench (where one of us is party) on 12.06.2024, where the issue has been decided that those who completed the degree prior to the date of the Government Order would be entitled to get the advance incentive increment. Following the same, yet another Division Bench judgment had come, of course, from the same Division Bench, (where one of us is party) in W.A.(MD)No.1052 of 2024 dated 21.06.2024. 4. Therefore, the issue now raised has been given quietus by the said Division Bench judgments of this Court at Madurai Bench, however, prior to the said judgments, since impugned order has been passed by the writ Court on 11.03.2024, the learned Judge of the writ Court, following an earlier order passed in W.P.No.1605 of 2023 etc., batch dated 29.01.2024, had dismissed these two writ petitions, namely, W.P.Nos.6252 and 6253 of 2024 by the impugned order dated 11.03.2024.

5. In view of the law having been declared by this Court, though it is submitted by the learned Special Government Pleader that, as against the judgments passed by the Division Bench at Madurai, there has been review filed which is pending, we are not impressed with the said submission made by the learned Special Government Pleader for the simple reason that, merely because a review has been filed by the State against the judgment passed by the Division Bench which has been followed in another Division Bench judgment, the settled legal position cannot be said to be an infirm one and not capable of being followed by the writ Court or the co-equal benches.

இதை பின்பற்றி - 11.3.2025 இல் - நமது ஒட்டுமொத்த - பெரும்பான்மை incentive வழக்குகளை ஒன்றிணைத்து - விசாரித்து - ஊக்க ஊதியத்தை உறுதி செய்து - 02.04.2025 இல் - விரிவான தீர்ப்பு வழங்க உள்ளது மிக்க மகிழ்ச்சியான செய்தி...

M.Fatima Vijaya Latha (இருநபர் அமர்வு - ஊக்க ஊதிய வழக்கு -

W.A.(MD)No.975 of 2024 Vs TN GOVT - Madurai Bench - Judgement Copy (Judges - R.SURESH KUMAR &

G.ARUL MURUGAN)

High Court of Madras (Madurai Division Bench) - Judgement - WA(MD)/1052/2024 - The State of Tamilnadu vs A.Govindasamy - Honourable Mr Justice R. SURESH KUMAR, Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN - 21-06-2024

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD PDF